In Order to Reassess the Value of Taxable Property There Must be a Change in the Market Value; Discovery of an Extreme Underassessment is Insufficient
After conducting a town wide revaluation of all taxable property in 2016, the town assessed the shopping mall owned by the Plaintiff at $86,549,400. Later that same year, the town learned that the property had been used as collateral for a loan in 2013 at a value of $220,000,000. Based on that information, the town reassessed the property for the 2017 tax year for $154,149,500. The Plaintiff appealed, arguing that no changes to the property or affecting the property had occurred that would legally support a reassessment under RSA 75:8.